Polio (Polio)
= Puls + intelligent
+ schwieriges sprechen;
Thema: Energiefluss; Lösung: positiv: Sprechen o. laufen;
negativ: Passiv sein;
Krankheit: Übertragen
durch Absonderung Nase/Mund/Faeces/Urin, durch Hautkontakt, Mund/Nase;
Kind: Innerlich
gelähmt/empfindet sich als unfähig (reden/verursacht Angst)/kann selbst
gesteckte Grenzen nicht loslassen/schicksalsergeben/will auf dem Arm sein/kann
nicht allein sein/selbst tätig sein/Kind und Mutter nervös; meldet sich im
Unterricht nicht/antwortet nicht auf Fragen/stellt sich Wettbewerb nicht;
Akut: Haut;
Positiv: Kennt
eigene Grenzen/will Ordnung/lässt sich beeinflussen;
Negativ: Angst:
(alleine sein/unbestimmten, nicht kontrollierbaren Geschehnissen/Zukunft/
Erwartungsangst (Stuhl)/Platzangst/ Fremden/nicht nach Hause gehen zu
können/Zuhause zu verlassen/es nicht zu schaffen/Hindernissen zu GROß/).
Empfindet sich schuldig am eigene Existenz/will perfekt sein/reizbar weil
nichts zu ändern ist, gibt auf bei Widrigkeiten/handeln = Stress, Anerkennung =
Stress weil zukünftige Forderungen folgen, fühlt sich ans Haus gebunden, will
Person/Ort + für immer, Unsicher, denkt langsam/Gedanken verschwinden/ Wörter
fehlen/ versteht anderen schlecht, Schuldgefühle andere eifersüchtig gemacht
zu haben. reizbar, langsam im Denken,
versteht die Worte, nicht ihre Meinung, beobachtet das Tun um ihn herum ohne
teilnehmen zu wollen, kann keine Grausamkeiten ertragen, „autistisches
Verhalten“, müde, schwach (zum Reden), hat Wörter im Kopf und kann sie nicht
aussprechen. ReizBAR/empfindLICH, hektisch/penibel, vergesslich für was er tun
wollte, Reizen werden als Schmerz empfunden. „Als ob Beinen gelähmt“, <
Menses (SCHMERZ)/nährreiche Speisen/Wind/ Kälte, Schlaf-/Sprachstörungen,
juckende Bläschen auf der Haut, Neurodermitis;
Ursache: Polioimpfung/Neid
anderer;
Glieder: Schmerz < während Fieber
Allgemeines: Amyotrophische Lateralsklerose/M.S./Polio
Komplementär: Nat-m.
Vergleich: Ex-can (Kind spricht spät/wenig/nicht). Coxsacky.
Siehe: Lycopodiumgruppe + Nosoden allgemein
Bar-c (irgendetwas = unterentwickelt) ó Polio ó Puls (klammert am Mutter)
Antidotiert: M.S.
Antidotiert von: Polioinfektion: Alum. Arn. Ars. Bell. Bung. (Biß richtet physiologisch und histologisch Schäden an, die Polio identisch/ähnlich sind). Bunga-c. Calc-mittteln. Caus. Chr-s. Cocc. Cur. Gels. Hydroph. Ign. Karw. Lath-s. Nux-v. Phos. Plb. Psor. Rhus-t (kaltes Wetter). Sil. Skorodit w. (= Ferr-ars.). Sulph. Tub. Vince. Zinc.
Vorbeugend: Lath.
Begleitend zu Polioimpfung: Sagitario sagitifolia.
Frei nach: Kaspar Mittelstrass, M.D.
1992
Poliomyelitis Epidemic - Reflections on the Polio Vaccine
The
poliomyelitis epidemic in
What
happened in
It is worth
noting that the Salk vaccine, that is, an inactivated vaccine, is largely used
in the Netherlands, whereas in Germany and all Eastern European countries the
oral method is used.(3) This was introduced in 1962, thanks to considerable
personal engagement on the part of Prof. Joppich (Goettingen). Prior to this,
epidemics occurred at 4 or 5 year intervals, with numbers gradually rising from
the early part of the century (1925 c. 4/1000,000 = c. 2,400 in Germany) to the
early 1950's (18/ 100,000 = c. 10,800), after which the disease almost
disappeared with the introduction of the oral vaccine. There were still 296
cases in 1962, but only 14 in 1986-1990, most of them brought in from
abroad.(4)
Epidemiology
in
1992 also
seems to have been a subliminal epidemic year in
At the
highly efficient virus laboratory of Prof. Enders, Stuttgart, a case of paralytic
polio was identified for the first time after many years in 1992 (male aged 46,
immigrant, unvaccinated, type 1) and 9 cases of complications following oral
vaccination were recorded (3 short-term pareses, 4 cases of post-vaccination
fever, 1 "encephalitis" - a boy of 5 with respiratory failure). Viruses
of different serotypes were found in all cases. The fact that different viruses
have been found in
R.S. spoke
of cosmic influences on diseases and epidemics; these are communicated to the
Earth, passed on via the food, which, of course, depends on the soil, and
influence the course of an epidemic.
Scientific
research has shown that sugar consumption favors an epidemic, and/or that
reactive hypoglycemia may lead to disease becoming manifest.
"Disease
entity" When a disease entity rears its head after enforced dormancy to
show the disease still exists we consider what the nature of this entity may
be. Can we recognize it in individuals who have overcome the disease but
nevertheless bear the marks of it for the rest of their lives, or in those who
have died from it?
The
12-year-old girl, top of the class, was celebrated as a winner at the Federal
Youth Games. Soon after she was tetraplegic, needed artificial respiration, and
finally died of poliomyelitis.
A boy of
about 6 developed quadraplegia, needing artificial respiration, and from then
on had to depend on a respirator. He was permanently in hospital and became the
soul and moral heart of the hospital. He had to be on his respirator throughout
his school years. Nurses and physicians came and went, he remained. The first
person to go and see when one had been away for years was this boy. He knew
everything that was going on, was pleased to have a visit, and you left feeling
all the richer for having seen him. Years later he got a place in the
Pfennigparade (Penny Parade) institution in
In the
first case we see prior damage during the incubation period, and what might
have been a harmless influenza-type illness turned into a fatal illness. In the
second case the patient survived. He developed special human and social powers
that probably only could develop because of this blow of destiny. I have
repeatedly seen similar qualities in people who have had poliomyelitis in the
past. (Could
Prior
damage suggests something "getting through" by way of karma. The
development of special qualities makes one think that the disease seeks to
achieve a metanoia, an inner change of direction. (The idea may be taken
further, for instance, also asking which disease does this disease heal? I am
not going to do so, as this may justifiably be called speculation.)
Historical
aspects
The disease
was first described by Heine, an orthopedic surgeon in
From 1949,
the virus could be grown in tissue cultures in vitro (Enders, Nobel Prize) and
not only via animals. These technological advances made it possible to develop
vaccines, which were needed as people were helpless in the face of rising
incidence. Young mothers also contracted the disease. It became not only a
personal and family, but also a social, problem.
The Salk
vaccine became available in 1956. It contains inactivated virus with adsorbents
and has to be given by injection. Complications were relatively common and not
accepted in the
Sabin's
oral vaccine was only generally accepted from 1962. Licensing was delayed due
to fears that the viruses might turn "wild" again. Sabin had
attenuated the wild virus in repeated animal passages, so that inoculation was
not followed by reactions or paralysis. Taken orally, the whole immunization
process - with infection, incubation, symptoms such as enteritis and catarrhal
changes - runs its course, except that the phenomena such as viremia,
meningismus and paralysis developing are drastically reduced. The recorded
frequency of complications is 1:10" - 1:3.5 xl0/4.
Immunization
process, vaccination method
In the
process, the organism conies to terms with the virus, acquiring all phases of
immunity via IgM/IgG antibodies (complement binding reaction and neutralizing
antibodies) and local immunity as a specific secretory IgA develops. The latter
phenomenon cannot be achieved with inactivated vaccine. This method is
therefore much more "stable" and confers better immunity than the
Salk vaccine. Oral vaccination given during an epidemic has brought this to a
stop. It only allows the disease to develop to the level it would normally
develop with natural, wild infection, for the disease may be seen as a
complication - occurring in 1 of 1,000 cases - of a harmless throat and
intestinal infection.
The virus
is, however, eliminated by vaccinated individuals for a limited period (c. 2
weeks), and they are therefore infectious for that period, "silently"
vaccinating "their environment." As a result, the danger of an
epidemic developing is much less in areas where the oral vaccine is used, and
gaps can be much larger than in areas where the Salk vaccine is used. The wild
virus disappears with this measure and only the vaccination virus circulates
among the population.
The method
of vaccination comes as close as possible to the natural process, essentially
returning to the method used with the first vaccination ever, which was for
smallpox. The choice of time is the only arbitrary element compared to the
natural process.
Initial
resistance to the oral vaccine had to do with concern over the safety. A virus
deriving from a person who had developed paralysis was attenuated in animal
passages so that its virulence was reduced, apparently due to mutation. The
gesture of the method indicates alienation from the human being. The process
is, however, reversible, and work is in progress on the problem. The strategy
of vaccinating each successive generation serves to protect from reverse
mutation.
The
vaccination virus' ability to immunize and its ability to mutate back are
unequal. This is the reason for further development work on the established
oral vaccine. The problems concern:
1 the
quantitative relationship between the three serotypes and, hence: the
individual power of each to confer immunity;
2 serotype
3 appears to present a particular risk of reverse mutation, and work is in progress
to develop a safer strain.
Other
aspects
So far we
have mainly considered aspects to be taken into account with immunization
against polio. They concern the infectious agent and not the host.
We have
seen that the infectious agent is merely an indicator for the host's situation
and consider it important to keep the host in mind - his karma, life situation
and constitution.
We do not
know how far immunization intervenes in the karma of the individual,
maintaining life situations that karma demands should be changed. Thus
immunization, and particularly mass immunization, influences the individual in
terms of a uniform collective.
Apart from
this there is always the question of whether vaccination makes people
healthier. The answer may be said to be in the negative, except for a certain
immunostimulation which is a "health factor."
In my view,
immunization against polio has no adverse effect on the constitution. If we
take the abovementioned immunostimulation to the constitution a health factor,
it may even have a strengthening effect. The processes initiated in the
metabolic sphere no doubt contribute to this.
The history
of vaccination began with smallpox vaccination. It became a legal requirement,
for the disease was known to be more than individual destiny. Society, the
State, felt that the disease threatened its stability, as evident from the high
incidence of the disease, the suffering it caused and the powerlessness
experienced in the face of it.
Tb. and
diphtheria immunization, both intended to limit the disastrous consequences of
these diseases, were of public interest as well as helping to reduce personal
suffering. Again, the State recommended immunization from the point of view
that "personal suffering is the suffering of society as a whole." With
tetanus, the situation is somewhat different. Immunization was initially
developed for military reasons - to save the soldiers for the State. With
pertussis vaccination we see the focus change more to the child again. It was
followed by polio, measles, mumps and rubella vaccination in that order. Poliomyelitis
vaccination was the first to combat a dreaded complication of a disease; the
same applied to measles. With rubella, the indication became more diffuse. In
this case, it is not the patient who is protected from the disease and its
consequences, but the next generation. With mumps we are even further removed
from the individual and the disease. The main motive is to maintain procreative
capacity, i.e. not protecting the patient but possibly only his ability to
create the next generation. This ranking order in time for vaccination and the
motives behind it shows a growing distance from disease and patient, from
coming to terms with the disease entity and preventing suffering.
The
question of the meaning of illness arises if the vaccinated individual is
included in our considerations of the vaccination process. It appears that the
answer to this background question is always in the negative.
Vorwort/Suchen Zeichen/Abkürzungen Impressum