Theorie
about proving
Misha Norland – the provings from
somewhere over the rainbow
How is it
possible that so many attacks have been made on homeopathy in the last couple of
years? The answer is very simple. Modern homeopathic gurus have successfully
removed any trace of the empirical method and
any trace
of science and present their own rationalistic transcendental theories.
Let’s start
with provings. Modern provings,
do not comply with the Hahnemann protocol anymore. The authors and
conductors of modern provings
proudly clam that they are conducted according to Jeremy Sherr’s,
Paul Herscu’s. Kent’s or someone else’s proving protocol and
methodology.
Indeed, it
seems to be very fashionable to use the methods and approaches as defined by
modern gurus. This fashionable approach holds more appeal than strictly
scientific double blind trial methods used by modern medicine.
If these
new methods are indeed better, the information from new provings
should be even more reliable than ever before. Why is it then, that Roger Van Zandvoort, the author of the biggest homeopathic repertory,
took it upon himself to remove 130.000 modern additions from the 2009 version
of his repertory? This was almost one quarter of his newer source material. In
doing so, not surprisingly, the repertory became more accurate in usage.
Modern
repertories are often criticized as containing too many new remedies and some
repertories even went as far as creating “classic” versions that disregard all
new materials altogether. If the new provings were
accurate
there would
be no need for this.
Misha Norland is the Founder and Principal of The School of
Homeopathy, Devon, England. Despite the fact that his proving methods are very
unconventional and despite the fact that the conclusions he draws from the
results
of the provings are even more controversial than the methodology,
his school has conducted about 25 provings, which are
now included in most of the modern repertories.
One of the
early clues that make it clear that the reader should be very cautious before
using the results of these “provings” is the stellar
company of Patrons of the school – Jan Scholten, Rajan Sankaran, Frans Vermeulen,
Jeremy Sherr,
Miranda Castro and Massimo Mangialavori. It comes as no surprise that the methodologies
used by this school and by Misha Norland
are far from Hahnemannian.
Proving of
AIDS nosode
Before even
starting to talk about whether this proving is Hahnemannian
or not, let’s quote the introductory comments:
“The
procedures for conducting a proving were laid out by Hahnemann in § 105-145 of
the Organon and on the whole there has been little
need to change them. They have been commented on and clarified by:
JT Kent “Lectures on Homœopathic
Philosophy Lecture XXVIII”
Jeremy Sherr “Dynamics
and Methodology of Provings”
Paul Herscu “Provings.”
Clearly,
the methodology of Hahnemann was not strictly followed, but REPLACED by
methodology of Jeremy Sherr, Paul Herscu
and J.T. Kent.
The section
The group proving gives us even more unsettling overview of the methodology:
“…There
appears to be a teletherapeutic effect produced by
the field generated by the assembled provers, their
experiences being in resonance. The whole group is involved and those members
who have not taken the remedy
may be as
affected as those that have.
This means
that the use of control provers who are given placebo
is not possible as they are also likely to prove the remedy. Because of the
group’s field effect It also means there is no need to repeat the dose if
symptoms do
not occur
immediately…”
So, in
other words, the observation is, that regardless of whether the person is
taking placebo or remedy, their symptoms will be the symptoms of the remedy.
How is this
possible? A clue might be gained by the section The Proving:
“This
stimulus, perhaps because it is amplified by the many co-experiencers,
and is ‘reawakened’ at monthly gatherings when experiences are recounted, is
sufficient to produce long range effects.”
It I
understand it correctly, provers actually exchange
experiences about the remedy on a monthly basis. It is therefore clear that
this “teletherapeutic field” that mysteriously
effects the group is simply interaction between
provers.
The desire to succeed and to be special is one of basic human traits. If other provers hear someone talking about interesting
transcendental experiences, you can bet that they will start experiencing
something similar.
Mind is a
mysterious thing and if you rely on dreams and mental images to give you the
true meaning of an experience (things so easily influenced by wanting to
experience something special), your experiences will be shaped
by your
interactions with other provers and by a wanting to
experience something special.
Interestingly,
the proving starts with everyone talking about mental images and impression
immediately after taking the remedy. So, if one of the provers
knows the remedy (and some of them do, since in some of the proving
even the
conductors of the provings take the remedy), this
will set the tone of the proving and reveal whatever “essence” the conductors
of the proving want to reveal.
This could
also throw some light on another statement from the section The Proving:
“ Results,
of the initial provings, though portraying some
symptom pattern, did not convey the ‘shape’ of the remedy. Therefore, I sent
some pillules to Mariette Honig
in Holland who carried out a similarly exhaustive, yet, ultimately unilluminating, proving… However, the picture of the nosode emerged with flying colours when in 1994 we carried
out two group provings amongst students at The School
of Homoeopathy…”
Well this
is now easy to understand. Is it possible, that the initial provings
followed a more strict protocol and the provers were
not influenced by experiences of other provers, so
the results were “unilluminating”? Is it also
possible that once we get a group of provers that is
influenced by the gatherings, the symptoms will be more transcendental and more
uniform? The symptoms will be closer to the symptoms that the conductors of the
proving
want to see
rather than the real symptoms.
How else
could we explain the phenomena that people taking placebo experience the same
symptoms as people taking the remedy? It has not been observed in clinical
trials and the control group taking placebo is used effectively to disregard
symptoms that are not caused by the remedy but are caused by environmental effects.
We have two
different experiences.
Experiences
from properly conducted clinical trials that repeatedly show that people taking
placebo do not develop the symptoms of the remedy.
And we have
“provings” following a different “method” which
allows free exchange of impressions on meetings, where some of the provers know the remedy and where usually the proving does
not include a control group taking placebo.
Both of
these methods yield different results and while the results of the clinical
trials follow scientific protocol, and their results can be rationally
explained, the proving method of Misha Norland must introduce the phenomena
of “teletherapeutic fields” and “telepathy” and other
mysterious phenomena affecting other provers to
explain the similarity of experience, when the answer is quite simple. If a
group of people can have a free interaction and sharing of mental and dream
experiences, it is conceivable that vagueness of these phenomena can be
interpreted as having a similarity on a certain level. It is also conceivable
that if there is a sharing of experiences, people
will
consciously or sub-consciously have a desire to experience something
interesting leading to similar experiences, dreams, etc.
Proving of
the Dream Potency
Some of the
problems with this proving are that the original potentized
substance are unknown.
A bigger
problem however is, that out of a fairly small group of 15 provers
only one was taking placebo. Out of 15 provers 10
were women, so it is not surprising that a common experience of the provers was, that they felt feminine.
Proving of
Salix Fragilis
Once again,
the proving group is incredibly small and unbalanced. Out of 7 people, there is
only 1 person taking placebo and interestingly enough, the person taking the
placebo is the only man in the group. Yes, all the provers
were women.
The worst
problem is though that this starts as a meditative proving and the “symptoms”
of the only prover taking the placebo are taken into
account as well. To give you an example of his mental stability, the symptom
that was included was: “During the proving my wife and I both experienced the
presence of a ghost in our house.“ This “symptom” was recorded in the proving
despite the fact that the prover was taking placebo
and despite the fact that no other prover has
experienced this. So despite a very dissimilar experience, it was recorded in
the proving.
Proving of
North Wales Slate
This
“proving” is a dream proving, where the provers have
recorded their dreams which could be of value if the proving would not be
supervised by the very people who taking the remedy as well and might have
influenced the direction of the proving by sharing their experiences with the
rest of the group and even discussing the substance the remedy was made of.
Since the methodology is compromised in this way, the symptoms gained from this
“proving” are of little value.
I could go
on discussing the problems in other provings
conducted by Misha Norland
and the members of the School of Homeopathy, but I would present only more and
more of the same evidence. Evidence being, that information gathered in these provings should not be used in homeopathy, because it was
gathered using controversial and questionable non – scientific methods which do
not produce objective information but may be largely influenced by the people
conducting the proving.
Group and
Proving Phenomena
To outline
the method followed by Misha Norland
and the School of Homeopathy, let’s discuss the article Group and Proving
Phenomena by Misha Norland
published in The Homoeopath No.72.
“At the
School we have achieved results using a variety of stimuli: using material
substance, by holding it, looking at it, meditating upon it, as well as with
the 30th to 200th potencies. We have invoked group provings
by one member ‘holding’ the concept/image of a thing.”
In other words, aside from actually taking the
remedy, other approaches are used. The “provers”
either think about the substance, hold it or simply look at it. That’s right,
there’s no need to even take the remedy. Apparently if
you look,
hold it or even think about it, you will experience this elusive “essence” of
the remedy. It is not surprising that the “essences” of remedies gathered in
this way prove the doctrine of signatures. If you think about a falcon, or look
at it, what other “images” can you get than flying, freedom, good vision,
clarity of sight, predator, aggressivity, etc. Let us
just compare the main ideas from the proving of Falco
Peregrinus Disciplinatus.
The main ideas are: Freedom, Focused, Clear Vision, Clarity, Above it all,
Speed, Fierce and Passionate, Explosive anger, etc.
The proving
has succeeded at simply brainstorming about the falcon and proves nothing,
except the fact that if you know what is the remedy proven and you do a
brainstorming session, results will be quite predictable. You will
get the
same “essence” as you would think when you gather your thoughts about the
particular subject. In order to actually prove the remedy, and avoid these
brainstorming sessions, nothing else than the double blind trial will do. When
analyzing the provings done in such a way or with a
more objectivity, you can discern a lot of new information about the remedy,
especially things you would not suspect when thinking about the substance.
There are
plenty of
examples in the old literature. Symptoms are discovered that seem odd and seem
to have nothing to do with the original plant/animal/mineral, yet they are key
to a correct prescription.
A quote
from the same article will give us some clues about why the group of the provers experience
similar things and why “essences” are closely related to the original
substance.
“This
stimulus, perhaps because it is amplified by the many co-experiencers,
and its ‘reawakening’ at monthly ‘gatherings’ when experiences are recounted,
is sufficient to produce long range effects“.
Not only do
the provings contain people who know the original
substance, they can freely influence everyone in these monthly interactions, so
that it is made certain, that the proving will yield the desired result. There
is no mystery why even the people not taking the remedy are included in the
proving and experience similar symptoms. They are influenced by the
recollection of other people’s experiences and placebo effect takes over.
“In
addition to following Jeremy’s [Sherr] proving
methodology, we record our experiences some minutes after beginning the
proving. We get images (such as black grave stones, waterfalls, orange flowers,
and responses to these images such as associated feelings, sensations or
thoughts); feelings (such as joy, sadness, and their responses such as smiling
or weeping); sensations (such as floating, burning, itching, and their
responses such as restlessness or scratching); thoughts and concepts which in
turn may evoke images, feelings and sensations. This then is our primary data.
It would be in accordance with tradition to say that proving responses are
headed up by image at the top of a
natural hierarchy which proceeds down the levels, through thoughts to
feelings to sensations.”
It has been
established by multiple provings, that the symptoms
of the remedy start manifesting some time after starting the proving. It can be
minutes, but usually takes hours and even days. It is debatable, whether all
the people were affected by the remedy just minutes after starting taking it,
or whether they are influenced by other factors, such as meal they have just
eaten, impressions of the day or actually knowing the proven substance and
wanting to experience something right away. This data is then used as the
primary data for the proving.
“Naturally
I felt obliged to run a proving of placebo. You see, I had speculated as to
whether we were proving ourselves, our group psyche, whether a group’s theme or
themes would emerge. The result was that no theme emerged within the group.
This was a distinctly different experience from being under the influence of
the proving of a thing, where common imagery, feelings and sensations dominate.”
No big
surprise here. If provers know that they are taking a
certain remedy, especially a substance that they are familiar with (a
well-known animal or a plant) it is almost certain, that even before they start
doing the proving,
they will
have some mental images and preconceptions. It is then easy to understand why
these images are experienced in the provings,
especially, when simply “meditating” about the substance. Placebo (or an
unknown substance) would be a different thing. Proving where provers do not know what to expect and when they cannot
form a mental image of the substance they are proving. It could be argued
therefore, that emergence of an “image” about the remedy is then actually a
good indication that the proving is biased and its results should not be used.
This would be the case for nearly all the provings
and especially all the provings done by Misha Norland and the School of
Homeopathy.
“A proving
begins, in a literal sense, with the intention to prove a thing, with it being
imagined, identified, obtained, and possibly potentised…It
is common experience amongst provers that certain
individuals … develop symptoms which subsequently are confirmed as belonging to
the proving before anyone else had ‘taken’ the thing. I have parenthesised
‘taken’ because those who meditate upon the thing come up with results which
are no less pertinent. Furthermore, we have found that those individuals within
the group who wished to remain outside of the proving have been unable to do
so; they are automatically included.”
This is
true, the moment people know that something is about to be proven, they will
expect something to happen and if they even know which remedy is going to be
proven, they will form a mental image of the original
substance.
It is then no mystery, that the moment they will think about the proving, they
will get the “right essence”.
“It is only
matter that is bound to space and time. The immaterial essence of the thing,
actuated by the intention of the proving group constellates the action field. …
the thing that we are dealing with is essence, spirit, … and is
not bound
within the constraints of space and time. Those who key into it are part of it
irrespective of distance or time; they know it telepathically.”
I would not
call the phenomena telepathy. It is simply thought and mental image. The moment
you know the substance, the mental image you form about the substance will
determine your experiences. It can be hardly called a telepathy. If I tell to a
group of people to avoid at all costs thinking about monkeys, they will not be
able to stop thinking about monkeys all the time.
Similar in
proving an interesting substance. If I announce that at some stage “condom”
will be proved, guess what everyone will be thinking of? STDs, condoms, pregnancy,
AIDS, HIV, bubble, trapped inside of something…
It is not
surprising that the proving of condom has “discovered” exactly these
“essences”.
“The
spiritual dynamis of intention, having no material
substance, is not bound to either space
or time. Should we accept this, then it follows that proving experiences may
not uncommonly predate a proving. However, the experiencer
would not know what to make of these experiences for they must be held within
the framework of the proving and given
its context to make sense.”
This means,
that the experiences are gathered even before the proving has begun and before
anyone has taken anything.
The summary
of key points from modern “provings” can be
summarized thusly:
- taking the remedy is not necessary to experience
the remedy
- it is not necessary for the proving to begin
to start experience the symptoms
- it
does not matter if you take placebo or not. You will experience valuable
symptoms
-
proving experiences are based on telepathy.
In the
researched opinion of P & W, that all information compiled by the above
methods, and called “Provings”, with its complete
lack of scientific protocol and a lack of Hahnemannian
compliance in which the data has been assembled, negates the ‘worth’ of the
information and should be discarded completely and removed from Materia Medica’s and Repertories
immediately.
When did we
as a specialist therapy, exchange science for telepathy and spirituality and
give away the foundation of credibility in modern homoeopathy? The only conclusion
that can be made is that the teachers, gurus and
leading
lights of modernistic homoeopathy are not homoeopaths.
What
defines a homoeopath? For the answer, and against the trend of modern
homoeopathic wisdom, we must look to the medical doctor, pharmacist, and
scientist upon whose research, the accurate prescriber and homoeopathic
physician should take his or her counsel from, in order to practice medicine
properly. Homoeopathy is a medical therapeutic specialty, and as such, needs
these words taken to heart.
Aphorism
285, 6th Edition, footnote”
A
fundamental principle of the homoeopathic physician (which distinguishes him
from every physician of all older schools) is this, that he never employs for
any patient a medicine, whose effects on the healthy human has not previously
been carefully proven and thus made known to him.
To
prescribe for the sick on mere conjecture of some possible usefulness for some
similar disease or from hearsay “that a remedy has helped in such and such a
disease” – such conscienceless venture the philanthropic homoeopathist will
leave to the allopath.
A genuine
physician and practitioner or our art will therefore never send the sick to any
of the numerous mineral baths, because almost all are unknown so far as their
accurate, positive effects on the healthy human organism is concerned, and when
misused, must be counted among the most violent and dangerous drugs. In this
way, out of a thousand sent to the most celebrated of these baths by ignorant
physicians allopathically uncured and blindly
sent there
perhaps one or two are cured by chance more often return only apparently cured
and the miracle is proclaimed aloud. Hundreds, meanwhile sneak quietly away,
more or less worse and the rest remain to prepare themselves for their eternal
resting place, a fact that is verified by the presence of numerous well-filled
graveyards surrounding the most celebrated of these spas.*
* A true homoeopathic physician, one who never
acts without correct fundamental principles, never gambles with the life of the
sick entrusted to him as in a lottery where the winner is in the ratio of 1 to
500 or 1000 (blanks
here
consisting of aggravation or death), will never expose any one of his patients
to such danger and send him for good luck to a mineral bath, as is done so
frequently by allopath’s in order to get rid of the
sick in an acceptable manner spoiled by him or others.
Homoeopaths
today. Should read and re-read this directive. It defines what a homoeopath is
and what a person claiming to be is or is not. To give a MEDICINE to someone
require intimate knowledge of it’s accurately, scientifically researched, and
reproducible symptom producing capabilities.
In
releasing the provings, as conducted, upon the
homoeopathic medical community, Misha Norland has joined the ranks of pseudo homoeopaths, and his
provings, along with other modern guru’s, are putting
the lives of patients
in danger
EXACTLY in the manner as described by Hahnemann.
Unfortunately,
Nakhira died, because she did not receive the treatment
she deserved. This outcome of this case resulted in a world-wide criticism of
homeopathy.
We offer no
criticism of the individual other than the practitioner claims to be a
homoeopath and follows Hahnemannian standards. This
is clearly NOT the case and needs to be stated publically, and real
practitioners of Homoeopathy distance themselves from this type of practise.
Giving a
prescription of a medicine, unknown to the practitioner, and without a proper
proving, and with the unfortunate outcome, should have been warning enough to
cease with the non Hahnemannian and scientific
protocols
in his own
flawed attempts to establish the action of substances for homoeopathic use.
As
Hahnemann states: “A true homoeopathic physician, one who never acts without
correct fundamental principles, never gambles with the life of the sick
entrusted to him as in a lottery where the winner is in the ratio of
1 to 500 or
1000 (blanks here consisting of aggravation or death), will never expose any
one of his patients to such danger.”
Elemental
levels of being, including Ether
The idea of
correspondence between heaven and earth was central to the alchemists. “As
above, so below” is the primary statement of The Emerald Tablet of Hermes, a
seminal text of the alchemical tradition.
‘As it is
above’ – the journey of spirit into Earthly form
1.
Etheric energy – is immaterial, revealing
itself through non-verbal, telepathic resonance, and takes form as intuition.
2.
Elemental Fire – almost immaterial, the energy of combustion, heat and
light, reveals itself to us as images.
3.
Elemental Air – dense enough to fly in, reveals itself as thoughts.
These are products of the intellect, representing our discriminative awareness
‘playing over’ our experiences and memories. Also communication
of information and ideas, language
and speech conveyed through air.
4.
Elemental Water – yet denser, to swim in, reveals itself as feelings.
These inform us of our likes and dislikes. Many memories, especially habits of
preference, are ‘held’ at this level.
5.
Elemental Earth – solid, to build with, reveals itself as sensations.
These are experienced in the body directly by the five senses. Primal memories
are also ‘held’ at this level. Physical pathology is the final
outcome of derangements of the above
elemental levels.
‘So it is
below’ – spirit grounded in matter
1st level –
Elemental Ether
Elemental Ether is apprehended as direct,
non-verbal experience. Like a telepathic resonance, Ether is related more to
the ‘vibrating fields of energy’ referred to by quantum physicists, than to
matter. At the Etheric
level we experience directly what is there. In
the therapeutic setting, it is understood to arise out of the ‘seed-state’ of
the disease and communicates its primal being, its disease signature
spontaneously. This is
analogous to a remedy’s signature, which is
expressed by the substance’s experience of being what it is. This is of course,
the ‘like cures like’ principle in action – more than that; it is why
homeopathy works – because signatures of substances and diseases match up in
their original seed states, as “vibrating fields of energy”. In health,
Elemental Ether manifests as intuitions and clairvoyance and gives us insights
into these interior
seed states. In diseases these are the very
features that we are in search of. We often get gestures from this level (that
is from Etheric energy manifesting in lower levels),
and images (from Etheric energy manifesting
in the 2nd level of Fire).
2nd level –
Elemental Fire
Elemental Fire links to images. It is chiefly
through intuition and clairvoyance (literally, ‘clear vision’) that spirit
mediated through the Etheric level, unhesitatingly
expressing itself in Elemental Fire as image.
This can be seen because Fire illuminates, as
well as heats. The heating aspect is related to passion and desire, such as are
enacted in religious rituals, where the holy image is revealed upon the altar,
and participants reconnect with spirit. There is an equally compelling sexual
expression, where the imagery is erotic. This aspect of passion (Fire) is easy
to market and exploit in our society where attention is focused upon the
material world. It is also in the form of images that many experiences and their
associated sensations and feelings are stored as pictorial memories. References
to images are mostly found in the Repertory in dreams, fears,
delusions and delirium sections. Here the
boundaries of consciousness and sub-consciousness are blurred. Our dreams
‘speak to us’ in pictures, while we literally talk in images whenever we use a
simile or a poetic
analogy. In drawings, especially children’s
fantasy sketches, images abound. They are also expressed in adult’s doodles
when exacting attention upon an object’s form is quiescent. As with dreams
their significance can
be revealed using association and imaginative
amplification. It is primarily through images that intuition, clairvoyance and
the spirit world manifest to us.
Intuition and clairvoyance? Differentiate by
reason. This leads to the next level.
3rd level –
Elemental Air
Elemental Air links to thoughts. These are
products of the intellect, that discriminative faculty which decides that
something is this and not that. Examples of malfunction include confusion,
being lost in thought,
deviations of memory and dyslexic
communication. Delusions and delirium states give rise to distorted thoughts
and confused awareness, while clear thinking helps us stay in touch with, and navigate
according to ‘the higher purposes of our existence’ as stated in paragraph 9 in
Hahnemann’s Organon.
Once we have established the truth of our
intuition, we can respond appropriately, that is, in the way of Homo sapiens
(thinking humans), and then cross the threshold (with human confidence) into
the more primitive, survival-oriented, world of feelings. Feelings ascertain
whether a thing suits us or not, whether we wish to accept it or not. This
function has been developed and championed by animals.
4th level –
Elemental Water
Elemental Water links to feelings that arise in
response to energy, sensations, thoughts and their associated images and
memories. Our empathetic resonance with each other and with animals is a
feeling response brought
to us by Elemental Ether. Feelings include
love, joy, rage, grief, jealousy, isolation – they manifest as emotion giving
rise to actions (primary emotion). When suppressed, emotions turn inwards upon
themselves
(secondary or compensated state). Secondary
feelings and emotions are complex derivations of the primary, uncompensated
source – this can make them difficult to navigate and of lesser value to the
prescriber.
Just as intuition mediated by thinking and
feeling, takes care of the soul, so instincts take care of the body. Instincts
are experienced as sensations which in turn drive actions and gestures. The
organs of locomotion and
in humans, the hands, are directly expressive
of instinctive will and of feelings as emotions. I like to imagine that the
energy ‘E’ of feelings plus motion equals e-motion. For this reason, gestures
and body language are worthy of the case receiver’s closest attention.
5th level –
Elemental Earth
Elemental Earth is experienced in the body
physically as sensations, directly by the senses or indirectly through body
memories. Sensations include descriptions of pain, such as clawing, shattered,
as well as experiences
of the other organs of sense, such as reeling,
red, shrill, sour or putrid.
The material level or corporeal Earth is where
the five different elements all meet and manifest. As they play out into the
body, if each is not balanced, physical pathology is the result, its exact
expression depending
upon the imbalance of the different elements.
Group and
dream provings and the five elemental levels
Increasingly,
work has been done over the last twenty years in the field of dream provings in group settings. Here, remedies’ effects are
noted specifically at level 2 (images). At the School of Homeopathy, we have
regularly carried out full Hahnemannian group provings since the early 90′s. Obviously, provers respond according to their individual
susceptibility, but those who do not take the pill and are susceptible, are
also affected. This is best explained by supposing that the entire group
resonate with the energy via the etheric field (level
1) of the remedy. We allow the group to sit with their experiences after
taking, or not taking the pill. Within the first minutes susceptible
individuals experience sensations (level 5) and images (level 2). Usually, it
is only later that thoughts arise and emotions are felt. In other words, image
and sensation are the primary data. We will return to this
finding
later, when we discuss what is most useful in receiving and analysing a case.
On potency
selection
Of
particular value to the prescriber is the relationship of the elemental levels
to potency. Of course there are other considerations which may modify this
choice. At the very least, we should note the cautionary injunction to
lower
potency where there is frank physical pathology threatening the well being of
the patient. As Elizabeth Hubbard-Wright has written, “Do not blow the fuse
with too high a voltage!”
We will
begin our series starting with Elemental level 1: Ether, (MM and CM potencies),
where spiritual influx directly informs matter, and move through to 5: Earth,
(mother tincture and low potencies). We will be using the potency scale that
was first propounded by Kent in reverse order. We are choosing this because it
is the most familiar.
Level 1:
elemental Ether, harmonise with the highest potencies MM and CM. Here the
expression is instantly of spirit-energy into matter-body. Children and vital,
un-medicated old people often operate at this level and respond well to
remedies at the highest potencies. These may also be of service in the most
acute situations, such as a life/death encounter, where maximum energy must be
expended for survival, no matter what the later repair cost may
be to the
organism. For instance, a high fever in a child may give rise to convulsions
and destruction of innumerable brain cells, in the process of vanquishing
invading bacteria. This expression of disease is direct and uncompensated. We
see and intuitively recognise the signature.
Level 2:
elemental Fire, also do well on high potencies: 10M and above. Elemental Fire
communicates in images; intuitions are rendered visible, and as in the case of
ether, the person experiences the world spontaneously. When questioning about a
thing, they want to ascertain, “where did ‘it’ came from? Where is ‘it’ going?”
They often see things in terms of connections. In health, they are passionate,
ardent and motivated. If they are sexually active, then this expression is
direct and uncompensated, likewise their connection with spirit is direct. HEAT
(passion) and LIGHT (image) are the key concepts.
Level 3:
elemental Air, do well on medium to high potencies: 200c to 10M. Elemental air
is primarily associated with thinking – seeking knowledge through
discrimination - working out that something is this and not that. They often
ask, “what is ‘it’? How can I understand ‘it’?” They instinctively view things
in terms of concepts and theories. This is not to say that they are necessarily
gifted analysts, for stupidity and wisdom are no more than the – and + of a
similar attribute. The dark side of elemental air, because it operates by
division and subtraction (from the elemental Fire above it, where intuitions
give rise to instant illumination), manifests in delusions of death, of
separation, of fears and terrors, of the various realms of hell. In these
instances communication (a primary Air function) breaks down and feelings of
isolation predominate. COLD (as in cold reason, cold hearted, emotionally
indifferent) and DARK (as in unconscious) are key concepts.
Level 4:
elemental Water, do well on lower potencies: 200c and below. Elemental Water is
primarily associated with feeling. These patients instinctively seek meaning by
dissolving and merging; they exhibit alternating and varied moods and their
lives are led by their emotions. They want to ascertain, “does ‘it’ suit me or
not? Do I accept ‘it’ or not?” LIQUID or FLUID is the key-concept.
Level 5:
elemental Earth, do well on low potencies: 30c to mother tinctures. These
patients seek meaning by developing safe structures and adopting fixed
attitudes. They present by knowing facts and details and by endlessly naming things.
They want to ascertain, “is ‘it’ really there? Is ‘it’ a fact? What is ‘it’
called?” SOLID and FIXED are the key concepts.
LM
potencies, starting low, begin to act at Earth level 5.
Regarding modalities:
marked modalities indicate a dynamic vital response, in respect of accepting or
rejecting. These indicate a level 4 – Water response. Therefore, whichever
lower (than third) level a patient is on, their particular potency may be
raised by a level. For instance, a patient with only physical symptoms and
fixed attitudes who has a very marked food aggravation and time modality, may,
on the basis of this, receive a potency higher than 30c, say a 200c potency.
The obverse of this rule also applies. For example, a patient operating at
Level 3 , an ‘air headed’, intellectual type with marked separation issues,
fears and so forth, but displaying minimal modalities, would respond to a
correspondingly lower potency, instead of 1M, say 200c.
Extracted
from Miasms, Signatures, AIDS:
We will
summarise our observations on the miasms and develop
a sequential model of miasms based upon their
evolution in pace and depth of invasion. We will begin by recapitulating
Hahnemann’s three miasms:-
First miasm, Psora – eruption of the
skin, which, if suppressed, becomes the developmental platform for all further
disease. Psora has the fastest development from
contagion to initial symptom production, but slowest overall evolution of
chronic disease.
Second miasm, Sycosis – relatively quick
development from contagion to initial symptoms
and medium-paced overall evolution of chronic disease. Here the
infectious agent, the gonococcus, inflames the mucous membranes of the
urinary-generative tract before penetrating more deeply into the organism,
typically developing iritis, rheumatism, warts and
heart valve disease.
Third miasm, Syphilis – slowest development (a protracted dormant
phase) followed by fast overall evolution of chronic disease. Here the
infectious agent, the spirochete, destroys the interior of the cell, eventually
attacking the most interior structures: the bones and central nervous system.
Hahnemann’s
triad is fundamental and sufficient for an understanding of the further miasms posited by us and other homeopaths. It has to be
understood that Hahnemann’s definition has been extended to include the taints
of non-infectious, non-venereal diseases which are nonetheless transmitted by
inheritance (genetic mutation), weakening the inherent susceptibility of the constitution.
The further miasms are:-
Tubercular miasm – a mixture of Syphilis and Psora;
Cancer miasm – a mixture of Sycosis and
Syphilis;
AIDS miasm – a mixture of Psora and
Syphilis.
From a
historical perspective, tuberculosis (famously a 19th century disease), cancer
(which escalated rapidly in the 20th century) and AIDS (currently escalating,
especially in Africa) have followed on each other’s tails over the last 200
years.
Rajan Sankaran’s miasm map is similar
to this one. It differs primarily at the front end, ‘unpacking’ the Psoric miasm into Acute, Typhoid,
Ringworm and Malarial miasms, while then it conforms,
with Sycotic being followed by Cancer, Tubercular,
and Leprous (which overlaps AIDS miasm). Sankaran places the Syphilitic miasm
last in the series, while this model has Syphilis as one of Hahnemann’s first
three miasms and subsequent miasms
as mixtures of the first three. Sankaran’s concept of
miasms (while elegant as well as practical) is
different from the concept underlying the model in this book. For Sankaran, the miasms represent
the pace, depth and desperation to which the vital sensation (uncompensated
state) is experienced in any disease.
Miasms
and signatures in three nosodes of mixed miasmatic character
Tuberculinum is associated with restless discontent. This situation might arise for
an individual who feels trapped in a restrictive and inimical environment. His
best option, given the suffocative feelings that he experiences, is to break
free. Once he has done so, he usually feels that there is no going back – it is
an irrevocable declaration of adolescent dissent. These assertions, give their
destructive nature, are primarily driven by the Syphilitic aspect of the miasm. Tuberculosis is derived from a disease that
typically arises in populations and societies that have been dispossessed.
Their fixed posture, their stuck place, is that their home, land and culture
have been irrevocably lost. Therefore, they are restlessly searching for a new
resting-place, but cannot find it. This severance from the protective home is
essentially a Psoric expression, characterised by
forsaken feeling, poverty and longing. It has been altered by violent upheavals
such as war and famine, giving the typically Syphilitic modulation for which
Tuberculosis is known.
Carcinosin
is associated with suppression of ego drives – the ‘unlived life’ syndrome
which so often underpins the cancer patient’s story, the Psoric
note – and striving for conformity (in this respect demonstrating its
relationship with Lac humanum, human milk). In
children, an uncompensated state often prevails, typified by difficult,
contrary and defiant behaviour, while in adults, a suppressed state typified by
fastidiousness and well-mannered behaviour is usually seen. It is common for patients
requiring Carcinosin, should they be fastidious, to
express it as a drive for matching things.
The nosode is derived from diseased tissue which is
characterised by overabundant proliferation of cells of one type, like bricks
in a wall. The cells represent a monomania of conformity. Cancers are only
limited because their unruly proliferation destroys the host organism. Sycosis is the leading miasm, in
the sense that the desire for more and more is expressed by the unruly growth
of the tumour, with strong Syphilitic (destructive) tendencies.
We have
projected our carcinogenic patterns into the world around us, for is not a vast
monocultured field of one species of plant a perfect
expression of a cancer? On a molecular level, the monomers that make up many
plastics are similar to tumours, being macro-molecules made up of smaller
molecules that seamlessly join themselves up in three dimensional structures.
Used for everything from food packaging to furniture, plastics are cheap,
ubiquitous and manufactured in vast quantities. The children’s toy, Lego, which
enjoys such universal appeal, is made of plastic bricks. Lego-land housing
estates designed with standardised computer programs are also an expression of
the conformity of the cancer miasm. Mass communication
has granted certain TV programmes worldwide popularity, providing the basis for
common thinking and responding. Conformity, wherever it rules, belongs to the
cancer miasm, while when the note is that of invading
personal boundaries, keeping you glued to the screen against your better
judgement, and then the Aids miasm is invoked.
Aids: The
AIDS nosode is associated with boundary issues:
keeping what is in, in; and what is out, out. The disease is characterised by a
complete breakdown of the immune system.
In health,
the vital force through the medium of the immune system reacts homeostatically to morbific
influences, throwing them off: keeping what is out, out. Examples on the
physical level are acute displays such as fevers, discharges, diarrhoea and
pus. Examples on an emotional level include shouting, hitting, moaning and
tears. However, should the individual become encumbered by disease through a
deficiency of acute responses, due to miasmic predisposition, social
suppression or drug use, and then chronic disease will settle in. In this
aspect, the AIDS nosode, because it is failing to
externalise, is similar to Carcinosin. Underpinning
both nosodes is the ubiquitous Psoric
influence.
The
relationship between AIDS nosode and Lac humanum is noteworthy. In Rajan Sankaran’s provings of Lac humanum, as in the AIDS proving, themes of houses,
self-loathing and rejection came prominently into the foreground. Not
surprisingly, milk and blood have features in common. Milk is derived from
blood. As blood circulates through the body, it ‘touches’ every cell, bringing
to mind the AIDS nosode theme of belonging and its
opposite of feeling outcast. The key common theme of AIDS nosode
and Lac humanum is relationships, how we nurture and
how we touch or don’t touch. Part of the Lac humanum
idea is ‘good mother, bad mother’ (partly because the mother’s influence helps
to socialise us); the AIDS idea is that of blood brothers, ‘good brother, bad
brother’ – trust and its opposite, betrayal. Blood brothers can be a group or
tribe, like the gay community. However, gay anal sex involves touching blood in
a potentially disease-creating way.
In Lac humanum, the central issue revolves around individuality
versus conforming to the group; self-interest versus helping others; going off
and doing one’s own thing versus staying at home and attending to family
obligations. The opposite of Lac humanum’s
individuality theme is universality. This, as we have already posited, is
similar to the AIDS theme: “I flow into you and you flow into me.” The opposite
of Carcinosin’s theme of conformity is “I shall not
do what you want of me – get out of my space!” The opposite of AIDS’ theme of
no barriers is “I am completely separate from you”. As Lac humanum
is about the price of individuality, Carcinosin is
primarily about the price of conformity, and AIDS is about the complete
breakdown of defences and barriers. The key concept of AIDS is chronic weakness
at the boundary. The positive outcome is freedom to experience love, while the
negative is feeling excluded, rejected, isolated.
Following
the theme of blood brothers, the ideal of the Aquarian age is the brotherhood
of humankind. Here the barriers between us are dismantled and we learn to
provide for each other. The ‘Global Village’ ideal of fair play and fair trade
becomes established. We come to understand the implications of sharing the
planet’s resources: the air that we breathe, the oceans, and the land. We share
the information of all nations via optical and electronic means. What we do and
think is transmitted via satellites into our homes, providing us with the
choice of staying in touch, and staying in agreement with one another. This
democratisation of information could result in a giant step in human evolution.
On the
negative side we note that the collapse of the immune defence system is
mirrored in world ecology by such phenomena as the ozone hole. The analogy
rests upon the fact that a healthy upper atmosphere acts as a barrier to
harmful radiation. Ecological homeostasis gone awry, as evidenced by the
current crisis of global warming, is another aspect of the AIDS miasm – the biosphere heats up because it cannot let out
enough of the heat it absorbs. The barrier has become too impermeable. (The
homeopathic proving of Germanium reveals a remedy with a similar theme. Peter
Fraser suggests that Germanium is to the AIDS miasm,
what Sulphur is to the Psoric miasm,
or Thuja is to the Sycotic.)
On a smaller scale, the rampant diseases of crops in a monoculture are similar
to immune system breakdown. They are combated by agricultural chemicals in a
manner which is mirrored by multiple drug therapies employed in the
conventional treatment of AIDS related diseases.
Increasingly,
crops are being genetically engineered to confer selective resistance to pests
and herbicides. Genetic engineering, like HIV, subverts not only the barrier of
the cell but its very centre, the nucleus, and thus may be immediately
recognised as related to the AIDS miasm. In a healthy
ecology, plants, bacteria, insects and animals interact for the benefit of the
whole. This wide-ranging symbiosis represents a ‘make love, not war’ attitude
in nature. The barriers protecting individual species remain intact because
they are not threatened by the overcrowding of monocultures. In human terms,
any war where land boundaries are breached is an expression of the Aids miasm, as is personal abuse, whether sexual or other abuse,
because the boundary of the self has been violated.
It is
worthy of note that AIDS was becoming rampant in 1983, when Pluto had entered
Scorpio, an event associated with plagues by some astrologers. We could unpack
the meaning of this slow-moving astrological configuration as personal and
ancestral shit hitting the fan! During this period the world was uncovering
child abuse. Also around this time, Chiron, the asteroid associated by
astrologers with wounding and healing, was discovered. The primary significance
of Chiron could be summed up in the phrase, “suffering is the passport”. As a
colleague, Ian Marrs, put it, “the flaw is the
floor”. In other words, the wound forms the basis on which healing can take
place. The wound of the AIDS miasm is also the
foundation of its healing – the breakdown of the barrier allows love to come
in.
The proving
of the AIDS nosode
The proving
was undertaken initially in 1988 using single doses in either the 30th or 200th
centesimal potencies of the blood of a man who subsequently died of
AIDS-related diseases. Results of the initial provings,
though portraying some symptom patterns, did not convey the ‘shape’ of the
remedy. Therefore, some pillules were sent to
Mariette Honig in Holland who carried out a similarly
exhaustive proving. The verified symptoms of these provings
have been included in the extraction presented. However, the picture of the nosode emerged with flying colours when in 1994 we carried
out two group provings with students at The School of
Homeopathy. One group received 30c and the other 200c.
At the
School we have carried out all our provings with unit
doses. This stimulus, because it is amplified by the group and reawakened at
monthly gatherings when experiences are recounted, is sufficient to produce
significant and long-range effects.
During the
course of the School weekend (Friday through to Sunday) we took stock of
thoughts, dreams, sensations, feelings and external world events, using
transcripts of tape recordings to ensure accuracy, and diaries kept by
supervisors and provers. Audio recording spanned a
period of three months, while some reports of cured symptoms continued to come
in for the next two years.
Major
themes in the proving
Because the
AIDS nosode is a relatively new remedy, insufficient
clinical evidence exists as to the ‘AIDS type’ of patient. However, some
consistent themes emerged, many with strong motifs of boundaries (houses,
walls, rooms, shell, contamination, popping seeds and bubbles), rejection, and
isolation:
Content.
Serene. Relaxed. Confident. Elated.
Sensation
of things coming out; of flying gently, of floating, of being uplifted; of love
and companionship for everyone; of growth, of blossoming.
Playful.
Remembered childhood.
Expansive.
Extravagant.
Wanton.
Invulnerable. Reckless.
Sympathetic.
Sensitive.
Massive.
Passive. Slow. Can’t be bothered.
Fragile.
Weak. Exposed. Shy. Dependent. Can’t cope.
Confused.
Forgetful. Making mistakes. Concentration difficult.
Restless.
Frustrated. Irritable. Easily offended. Insensitive. Violent. Desire to kill.
Feeling
rejected; “… does not belong”; “… felt excluded, lied to”; outcast.
Feeling
betrayed. Suspicious. Persecuted.
Withdrawn.
Wants to be alone. Isolated.
Frightened.
Loss of identity.
Loss of protection/shell/wall.
“I felt that I had lost my wall and my shell, and there was a free flow of
emotions both in and out. I was exposed, almost naked, with no control.” “…
uninterrupted flow between self and group”.
Feeling
contaminated and fear of contaminating others (always washing).
Self-loathing.
Responsibility
for others; responsibility for children.
Left-sidedness.
Curative
response to the remedy proving
I think the
curative action of the proving [of the AIDS nosode]
is that I did have a sense of feeling that I belonged with people that I had
never had before. I had always felt like I was outside and unacceptable, so all
the while, whilst I might look like I was part of the group, I actually felt
myself on the outside.
The night
of the proving, I slept really well, like I haven’t slept in ages. Very
comfortably. I remember my dreams were very colourful, I remember a whole load
of flowers. [A number of provers in the initial
stages of the proving reported images of flowers and seeds.] Usually my dreams
are very unlike that, basically very dark, very violent, as if there is
something following me, there is blackness and I don’t know what is going on.
Constant nightmares rather than dreams. The nightmares have completely stopped.
And one more thing that has stopped is that I no longer always feel crushed,
like there is a heavy weight and as if I am being sexually tortured in some
way.
And the
other thing that went after the proving, is a lot of anal bleeding and vaginal
pain, which I realise dates back to tearing.
I don’t
throw up when people hug me. It’s quite an advantage actually, it’s kind of
detrimental to relationships! But yes, I used to be very nauseous around touch
and my osteopath really noticed it, that she was able to work on me much more.
Before I would have a delayed reaction to the session. Over time we had found a
way of working but I would still vomit afterwards, maybe even a day later.
I feel a
bit like a small child. I think before, I felt that there was this small child
in this adult’s body, screaming its head off to be heard. That was one of the
things I felt I carried, this giant scream around in me all the time. I don’t
have that now. I guess it’s the difference between vulnerable and open. I feel
like a more open small child who will be able to receive and take things;
whereas before, I just felt completely vulnerable, and terrified, making sure
that I kept people out, and yet desperately wanting to be in contact with them
as well.
Dream
themes
For the provers of the AIDS nosode the
most striking and reoccurring image to appear, particularly in dreams, was the
form of a house. More than half of the dreamers had this. This image was
reiterated in many different configurations and can be used to describe the
wider picture of the remedy. We will offer interpretations of this imagery when
we come to it towards the end of the proving. Dream themes included:
Huge
houses, vast rooms, small outside, huge within;
Houses or
things richly ornate, jewelled, gold, beautiful interiors, colours stunning and
rich;
Big, grand
houses, ornate, ramshackle or both;
Staircases
and corridors;
Wood,
metal, water;
Colour:
red;
Violence;
Panic;
Responsibility;
Anger,
irritability;
Fear;
Teeth;
Snow;
Septic
state;
Children;
Transport,
travelling, buses, cars, trains, airports, bus station, train station;
Lots of
people/being busy/rushing about.
Vorwort/Suchen. Zeichen/Abkürzungen. Impressum.